Credit Where Credit is Due
Well, I wasn't going to say anything about the latest Kathy Griffin dust up, but someone with a rational voice has to speak up. Unfortunately, no one with a rational voice was available to make this post, so instead, I'm going to add my nonsensical take to those of the Catholic League and the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences.
On September 8, at a taping of the Creative Arts portion of the Emmy awards, in an acceptance speech for an award given to her show, Kathy Griffin: My Life on the D-List, Griffin said explicitly that Jesus had nothing to do with her show's victory.
In fact, her exact words were:
She then held up her trophy, and remarked that Jesus could "suck it", and that the idol was now her god.
The Academy of Television Arts & Sciences has decided not to broadcast all of her comments when the show airs. They will instead present an edited (censored) version of the speech.
And Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League, is incensed by the whole spectacle, saying Griffin's quips were equal to the racial slurs that recently got Don Imus and Michael Richard into so much trouble.
Now, I've looked through all the religious documents I have at my disposal and even more at the library, I consulted the World Book Encyclopedia, Googled divinity and theological philosophy on the interwebs, asked a Magic 8 Ball, and tried to read the grounds in the bottom of my coffee mug to figure out just how her comments equate to racism, or even any type of hate speech. And umm . . . well, I just can't figure out how that angle applies.
Donohue insists it's the same thing because she offended a lot of people.
Well, offending people doesn't automatically imply racism or hate speech. I offend people all the time, and I don't hate anyone. In fact, I really like most people.
Besides, if people are offended, isn't the offense they're taking just a little bit misplaced?
I mean, Griffin simply refused to acknowledge any input Jesus might have had in seeing to it that a third-rate cable show received a tiny golden statue. How is that offensive? Do we have to give props to an all powerful being for every single one of life's events? Would it be the same if I said I don't think god had anything to do with protecting our troops in Iraq? How about if I said god had nothing to do with Katrina? Would one be offensive and not the other? If so, why?
Anyone who is offended by her remarks either has a very short fuse, and they succumb too readily to these latter day over-blown politically correct attitudes, or they have behind-the-scenes access to the show and know for a fact that Jesus had a great deal to do with its success. I've not heard any reports from the show's cast and crew that any deities were ever on the set or in the staff room, so you can draw your own conclusions about which applies to those who may be offended.
They don't seem to realize that Jesus himself taught people to "turn the other cheek" as one of his most altruistic tenets. Hell, the man himself never got offended by anything anyone ever did to him. They hung him on a cross until he was dead, and he forgave them for chrissake! He wasn't offended.
Sheesh! I don't know.
Perhaps the more we evolve, the thinner our skin becomes, because it seems like people get chapped about the stupidest things these days. Everyone knows Jesus really didn't have anything to do with Griffin's Creative Arts award. We've invented some great and wonderful gods in our time, and they have more important things in the universe with which to contend. They are way too busy helping rappers win Grammies, bestowing victories upon athletes who pray the hardest, and destroying our cities and fellow human beings with hurricanes and tsunamis to bother with the Emmies. . . . Well, maybe the prime time Emmies.
Since it's impossible to know which one did the work here, I'd to thank whichever god was responsible for this post for my fingers, my keyboard, and my computer. I couldn't have done it without you.
On September 8, at a taping of the Creative Arts portion of the Emmy awards, in an acceptance speech for an award given to her show, Kathy Griffin: My Life on the D-List, Griffin said explicitly that Jesus had nothing to do with her show's victory.
In fact, her exact words were:
. . . a lot of people come up here and thank Jesus for this award. I want you to know that no one had less to do with this award than Jesus.
She then held up her trophy, and remarked that Jesus could "suck it", and that the idol was now her god.
The Academy of Television Arts & Sciences has decided not to broadcast all of her comments when the show airs. They will instead present an edited (censored) version of the speech.
And Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League, is incensed by the whole spectacle, saying Griffin's quips were equal to the racial slurs that recently got Don Imus and Michael Richard into so much trouble.
Now, I've looked through all the religious documents I have at my disposal and even more at the library, I consulted the World Book Encyclopedia, Googled divinity and theological philosophy on the interwebs, asked a Magic 8 Ball, and tried to read the grounds in the bottom of my coffee mug to figure out just how her comments equate to racism, or even any type of hate speech. And umm . . . well, I just can't figure out how that angle applies.
Donohue insists it's the same thing because she offended a lot of people.
Well, offending people doesn't automatically imply racism or hate speech. I offend people all the time, and I don't hate anyone. In fact, I really like most people.
Besides, if people are offended, isn't the offense they're taking just a little bit misplaced?
I mean, Griffin simply refused to acknowledge any input Jesus might have had in seeing to it that a third-rate cable show received a tiny golden statue. How is that offensive? Do we have to give props to an all powerful being for every single one of life's events? Would it be the same if I said I don't think god had anything to do with protecting our troops in Iraq? How about if I said god had nothing to do with Katrina? Would one be offensive and not the other? If so, why?
Anyone who is offended by her remarks either has a very short fuse, and they succumb too readily to these latter day over-blown politically correct attitudes, or they have behind-the-scenes access to the show and know for a fact that Jesus had a great deal to do with its success. I've not heard any reports from the show's cast and crew that any deities were ever on the set or in the staff room, so you can draw your own conclusions about which applies to those who may be offended.
They don't seem to realize that Jesus himself taught people to "turn the other cheek" as one of his most altruistic tenets. Hell, the man himself never got offended by anything anyone ever did to him. They hung him on a cross until he was dead, and he forgave them for chrissake! He wasn't offended.
Sheesh! I don't know.
Perhaps the more we evolve, the thinner our skin becomes, because it seems like people get chapped about the stupidest things these days. Everyone knows Jesus really didn't have anything to do with Griffin's Creative Arts award. We've invented some great and wonderful gods in our time, and they have more important things in the universe with which to contend. They are way too busy helping rappers win Grammies, bestowing victories upon athletes who pray the hardest, and destroying our cities and fellow human beings with hurricanes and tsunamis to bother with the Emmies. . . . Well, maybe the prime time Emmies.
Since it's impossible to know which one did the work here, I'd to thank whichever god was responsible for this post for my fingers, my keyboard, and my computer. I couldn't have done it without you.